Preliminary observations on the flower visitors of <i>Nasa colanii</i> (Loasaceae), a poorly known species endemic to northern Peru
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nasa is the most diverse genus among the family Loasaceae and it is mainly distributed in Peru. Most species of this genus are microendemics, with distributions restricted to very specific locations; such is the case of Nasa colanii Dostert & Weigend. This species — previously only known from the type collected in 1978 from the Amazonas region of Peru — lacks information about its biology and ecology. To improve our understanding of the reproductive biology and pollination ecology of N. colanii, we observed flower development and insect floral visits in a cloud forest in the Amazonas region. The flowers of N. colanii are nectariferous and protandrous. The typical stamen movement to the flower center of the subfamily Loasoideae appears to be autonomous. Only well-developed (elongated) pistils showed positive stigmatic receptivity to 3% hydrogen peroxide. Syrphid flies (Baccha sp.) and small beetles (Baridinae spp. and Alticini sp.) were the only observed flower visitors. The syrphid flies visited the flower and foraged for pollen, whereas the small beetles were found already in the flowers and seemingly used it as a shelter. Results suggest that N. colanii might be adapted to fly pollination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".