MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spontaneous and induced chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood of women with endometriosis: evidence of genomic instability

2021· article· en· W3161633547 on OpenAlexaff
Parnaz Borjian Boroujeni, Zahra Beheshti, Seyedeh H. ESHAGHI ZADEH, Parvaneh Afsharian, Anahita Mohseni Meybodi

Bibliographic record

VenueMinerva Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndometriosisPeripheral bloodChromosome instabilityGenome instabilityLymphocyteMedicineMitomycin CCancerPeripheralPeripheral blood lymphocyteDiseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyOncologyBiologyChromosomeDNA damageDNAGeneticsGeneSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a prevalent gynecological disease which can lead to certain types of cancers. We investigated the spontaneous and induced chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of endometriosis patients. METHODS: We performed a pilot study utilizing mitomycin C (MMC) to assess chromosomal instability in the peripheral blood of participants. The patient group consisted of 20 infertile endometriosis patients and the controls of 20 healthy fertile women. Blood samples were collected, and two distinct lymphocyte cultures were prepared to evaluate the baseline and the MMC induced chromosomal aberrations. RESULTS: The results showed a significant difference before and after MMC treatment in both groups (P<0.001) and also revealed that endometriosis patients are far more sensitive to MMC than controls (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The significantly higher frequency of induced and spontaneous chromosomal aberrations in patients can be consider as a sign of genomic instability and the defect in DNA repair mechanisms, which can be both assumed as a driver of cancer development in endometriosis patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinerva Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicEndometriosis Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207