MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161646632 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2021.3076795

Cooperative Computation Offloading for Multi-Access Edge Computing in 6G Mobile Networks via Soft Actor Critic

2021· article· en· W3161646632 on OpenAlexaff
Chuan Sun, Xiongwei Wu, Xiuhua Li, Qilin Fan, Junhao Wen, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology
KeywordsComputation offloadingComputer scienceMobile edge computingCloud computingServerEdge computingDistributed computingComputer networkComputationMarkov decision processLatency (audio)Edge deviceMobile cloud computingMobile computingMarkov processAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by numerous emerging services and applications of mobile devices, multi-access edge computing (MEC) is regarded as a promising technique for massive Internet of Things (IoT) with 6G mobile networks to alleviate core network congestion and reduce service latency. However, the conventional MEC suffers from the infrastructure without the cloud server (CS) and cooperation of multiple edge servers (ESs), which cannot deal with the large-scale computation tasks in the ultra-dense smart environments. This paper investigates the issue of the cooperative computation offloading for MEC in the 6G era. The proposed MEC system allows the cooperation of edge-cloud and the cooperation of edge-edge to address the limitation of single ES and the nonuniform distribution of computation task arrival among multiple ESs. To support low-latency services, we model the cooperative computation offloading problem as a Markov decision process, and propose two intelligent computation offloading algorithms based on Soft Actor Critic (SAC), i.e., centralized SAC offloading and decentralized SAC offloading. Evaluation results show that the proposed algorithms outperform the existing computation offloading algorithms in terms of service latency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and EngineeringSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207