MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3161680980 · doi:10.2147/ijgm.s309232

The Application of Computed Tomography Perfusion in the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Anterior Circulation

2021· article· en· W3161680980 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Weiyong Zhang, Shifeng Xiang, Su-Jun Yang, Yiping Wu, Juntao Li, Guokun Liu, Jianfei Li, Weiwei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of General Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerfusion scanningCerebral blood flowPerfusionStroke (engine)Computed tomography angiographyArea under the curveReceiver operating characteristicMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyComputed tomographyAcute strokeAngiographyInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the predictive value of each perfusion parameter of the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) in CT perfusion (CTP) imaging for the prognosis of endovascular treatment at the time of admission in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The imaging data of 62 patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation with an onset time of 6 h or less were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent the one-stop whole-brain dynamic volume four-dimensional (4D) CT angiography (CTA)-CTP and cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within seven days after treatment. The patients were divided into better and worse prognosis groups according to their clinical symptoms, combined with an MRI-ASPECTS score of ≤ 6 within seven days after treatment. The observed perfusion parameters included cerebral blood flow (CBF)-ASPECTS, cerebral blood volume (CBV)-ASPECTS, mean transit time (MTT)-ASPECTS, and time to peak (TTP)-ASPECTS. The difference in ASPECTS scores involving the CTP parameter, as well as diagnostic power, was compared between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: All CTP-ASPECTS scores negatively correlated with clinical prognosis. The higher the CTP-ASPECTS scores preceding treatment in patients with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation, the better the prognosis. There were statistically significant differences in the scores of CBF-ASPECTS and CBV-ASPECTS between the two groups (P < 0.05). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis showed that the parameter with the largest area under the curve (AUC) was the CBF-ASPECTS score (P = 0.003), with a sensitivity of 90.9%, a specificity of 59.1%, and an AUC of 0.806, which was the most valuable prognostic predictor. CONCLUSION: The CBF-ASPECTS score presented significant value as a primary indicator for predicting the outcome of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation, and it had good application prospects in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of General MedicineSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207