Combined effect of temperature and water stress on seed germination of four <scp> <i>Leptocereus</i> spp </scp> . ( <scp>Cactaceae</scp> ) from <scp>Cuban</scp> dry forests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cactus seeds have developed adaptations to survive with high temperatures and low soil moisture in their habitats. We studied the effect of the combination of four water potentials (0, −0.2, −0.4 and −0.6 MPa) and two temperatures (25°C and 35°C) on germination and seedling mass of four endemic Leptocereus species from Cuba. There were two semi‐arid coast species ( L. arboreus and L. santamarinae ) and two species inhabiting dry inland karstic hills ( L. ekmanii and L. scopulophilus ). We hypothesized that: (a) a decrease in water potential and an increase in temperature would result in low and slow germination, as well as in low seedling mass, and (b) ungerminated cactus seeds after exposure to combined water and temperature stress would have a high recovery capacity. The minimum time required for the seeds to start germination (Tmin), mean germination time (MGT) and germinability were evaluated. In addition, seed mass, the recovery after treatments of non‐germinated seeds, and the seedling fresh mass obtained under different treatments were compared between species. In general, germination was only obtained at 25°C and germinability and seedling mass were drastically affected by the reduction from 0 MPa to −0.2 MPa. Seeds showed thermoinhibition at 35°C at all water potentials. There was a tendency to increase the MGT with decreasing water potential in three species. Low seed recovery occurred at all combined treatments for three species. If the predictions of increased temperature and decreased rainfall for the Caribbean region occur, a reduction in the germination of the Leptocereus species studied is expected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".