MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3161689889 · doi:10.1101/2021.05.21.445124

<i>Plasmodiophora brassicae</i> infection threshold – how many resting spores are required for infection of canola ( <i>Brassica napus</i> )

2021· preprint· en· W3161689889 on OpenAlexaff
Kher Zahr, Yalong Yang, Alian Sarkes, Snezana Dijanovic, Heting Fu, Michael W. Harding, David Feindel, Jie Feng

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture Food and Rural DevelopmentAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubrootCanolaSporeBrassicaBiologyInoculationAgronomyPathogenHorticultureBotanyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clubroot, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae , is an important disease of canola and other brassica crops. Improved understanding of host and pathogen biology is frequently useful in guiding management strategies. In order to better understand infection thresholds, seven-day old seedlings of canola cultivar Westar were inoculated with serially diluted concentrations of P. brassicae resting spores. Controlled soil and plant inoculation assays were performed and the plants maintained in a greenhouse for 42 days and clubroot disease severity evaluated visually. Clubroot symptoms were observed in soils containing as low as one spore/mL soil and on plants inoculated with as few as ≤ 100 resting spores. These thresholds were lower than any previously reported. The results indicated the importance of highly sensitive detection methods for P. brassicae diagnosis and quantification methods for clubroot risk prediction in soils. Furthermore, these results highlighted the low probability of obtaining P. brassicae single spore isolates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics→French-language works237,207→