Breakdown of random matrix universality in Markov models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biological systems need to react to stimuli over a broad spectrum of timescales. If and how this ability can emerge without external fine-tuning is a puzzle. We consider here this problem in discrete Markovian systems, where we can leverage results from random matrix theory. Indeed, generic large transition matrices are governed by universal results, which predict the absence of long timescales unless fine-tuned. We consider an ensemble of transition matrices and motivate a temperature-like variable that controls the dynamic range of matrix elements, which we show plays a crucial role in the applicability of the large matrix limit: as the dynamic range increases, a phase transition occurs whereby the random matrix theory result is avoided, and long relaxation times ensue, in the entire "ordered" phase. We furthermore show that this phase transition is accompanied by a drop in the entropy rate and a peak in complexity, as measured by predictive information [Bialek, Nemenman, and Tishby Neural Comput. 13, 2409 (2001)NEUCEB0899-766710.1162/089976601753195969]. Extending the Markov model to a Hidden Markov model (HMM), we show that observable sequences inherit properties of the hidden sequences, allowing HMMs to be understood in terms of more accessible Markov models. We then apply our findings to fMRI data from 820 human subjects scanned at wakeful rest. We show that the data can be quantitatively understood in terms of the random model, and that brain activity lies close to the phase transition when engaged in unconstrained, task-free cognition-supporting the brain criticality hypothesis in this context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".