MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Are melting alpine glaciers a source of legacy priority contaminants to downstream environments? A high-frequency analysis of water chemistry in the Canadian Rockies.

2020· article· en· W3161871502 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kasia J. Staniszewska, Colin A. Cooke, Alberto V. Reyes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsGovernment of AlbertaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlacierTrace elementHydrology (agriculture)MeltwaterWater qualityEnvironmental scienceWeatheringWatershedTurbidityContaminationEnvironmental chemistryChemistryGeologyGeomorphologyGeochemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaciers are retreating across the Canadian Cordillera. As this ice melts trace elements and other contaminants, accumulated from millennia of atmospheric deposition, are subject to release with uncertain consequences for downstream water quality. It is therefore imperative to constrain the rate and magnitude of contaminant input to river systems from glacierized watersheds. Meltwater chemistry was monitored and modelled at a high temporal frequency using a combination of grab-sampling and sondes for physical, chemical, and hydrological parameters at the outlet of proglacial Sunwapta Lake, Athabasca Glacier, Canada. Principal component analysis revealed that chemical parameters could be split into two groups with distinct seasonal trends. Group A encompasses solutes and endogenic bedrock weathering associated elements. Group B includes particulate, and exogenic dust-associated elements. Group A element concentrations were highest during low flow conditions and were correlated positively with conductivity. Group B element concentrations were highest during high flow conditions and had a moderate positive correlation with turbidity. Concentrations of potentially hazardous trace elements remained below Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines throughout the hydrological season (THg < 2.7 ng/L; TPb < 1.7 µg/L; TAs < 0.34 µg/L; TCr < 1.9 µg/L). Trace element fluxes (kg/year) and yields (kg/year/watershed area) were modelled at a high temporal-resolution by pairing grab sampling results with corresponding strongly correlated high-frequency physical parameters: conductivity or turbidity. Annual fluxes and yields were comparable or lower than fluxes and yields from other glacial meltwater streams globally. Annual fluxes and yields were THg: 95 kg/yr and 3.2 g/yr/km2; TPb: 34 kg/yr and 1.2 kg/yr/km2; TCr 39.5 kg/yr and 1.4 kg/yr/km2; TAs: 7.3 kg/yr and 0.25 kg/yr/km2. Numerous studies have suggested that glaciers are a significant source of high concentrations, fluxes, and yields of contaminants, including: pesticides; PAHs; PCBs; and toxic trace elements. In contrast, we found low concentrations, fluxes, and yields of trace elements in meltwater from the rapidly retreating Athabasca Glacier. Grab-sampling complemented by high-frequency monitoring of physical and chemical water parameters allowed a high-resolution view of water chemistry variation in meltwater from the Athabasca Glacier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→