Abstract 13400: Patients Less Than or Equal to 2.5kg Have Higher Morbidity and Mortality After Norwood-sano Palliation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: In patients with single ventricle heart disease, prematurity and low weight at the Norwood operation are risk factors for mortality. Reports assessing peri-operative and long-term outcomes of Norwood palliation in patients ≤ 2.5kg are limited. Methods: All patients who underwent Norwood-Sano procedure between 2005-2020 were identified. Patients ≤ 2.5kg at the time of the Norwood operation (cases) were matched 1:3 with patients ≥ 3.0 kg (comparisons) for year of surgery and cardiac diagnosis. Demographic and peri-operative characteristics, survival to hospital discharge and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes were compared. Results: Twenty-seven cases (mean±SD weight 2.2±0.3 kg, mean age 15.6±14.1 days at surgery) and 81 comparisons (mean weight 3.5±0.4 kg, mean age 10.9±7.9 days at surgery) were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in the presence of chromosomal abnormalities (7.4% vs. 12.3%, p=0.485), prenatal diagnosis made (88.9% vs. 75.3%, p=0.141), or duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (140.7±65.6 vs. 121.3±42.3 min, p=0.068) between cases and comparisons, respectively. Cases had a longer time to post-operative lactate < 2 mmol/L (33.1±27.5 vs. 17.9±12.2 hours, p<0.001), longer duration of ventilation (30.5±24.5 vs. 18.6±17.5 days, p=0.005), higher need for dialysis (48.1% vs. 19.8%, p=0.007) and greater need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (29.6% vs. 12.3%, p=0.004). Cases also had significantly higher in-hospital (25.9% vs. 1.2%, p<0.001) and 2-year (59.2% vs. 11.1%, p<0.001) mortality. The 2-year Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, III, was completed on all living cases (n=11) and most comparisons (n=63; 1 refusal and 8 too young); delay, a score of < 70, showed the following differences between cases vs. comparisons for cognitive (86.9 vs. 91, p=0.363), language (84.9 vs. 88.2, p=0.494) and motor (73.6 vs. 87.3, p=0.013). Conclusions: Patients ≤ 2.5kg at the time of Norwood-Sano have significantly higher post-operative morbidity and mortality up to 2-year follow-up, and worse 2-year neurodevelopmental motor outcomes. Additional studies are warranted to assess the outcome of alternative therapeutic options in this patient population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".