MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162008140 · doi:10.1061/9780784483374.026

Development and Testing of Prototype Sabatier Reactor for Martian In Situ Propellant Production

2021· article· en· W3162008140 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Zlindra, Dagan Schoen, Francis Mayer, Jonah Shapiro, Omar Qazi, Thomas G. Richmond, Noah Caleanu, Yash Adnani

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth and Space 2021 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRocket and propulsion systems research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropellantMars Exploration ProgramProcess engineeringMethaneEnvironmental scienceMethanationMartianAerospace engineeringAstrobiologyEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of near-surface water on Mars, in the form of ice at mid-upper latitudes, has been established and supported by the scientific community. This discovery has allowed for research into in-situ resource utilization techniques (ISRU) to grow immensely. In-situ rocket propellant (methane) production has been proposed as a way to reduce costs of Mars-bound space exploration missions. One of the approaches currently being explored involves a reaction with carbon dioxide and hydrogen gases at high temperatures and pressure over a solid catalyst in a packed bed reactor (PBR) to produce methane and water, also known as the Sabatier reaction. As a first step to creating a prototype modular “Sabatier Fuel Plant” for use on Mars, our team designed and constructed a lab-scale test reactor based on published literature in the field. Our research is focused on testing the behavior of multiple methanation catalysts and their capacity for the continuous production of methane gas via the Sabatier reaction. Results from the test reactor will inform the design of a full-scale fuel plant on Mars. The team’s next steps are to develop a technologically and economically feasible proposal to construct and operate such a plant. The materials and methods needed to construct the reactor are detailed; along with a brief explanation of how proposed catalyst testing is linked to future fuel plant design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth and Space 2021Same topicRocket and propulsion systems researchFrench-language works237,207