Bibliographic record
Abstract
In lieu of a dissertation, a lecture recital, pedagogy workshop, and recital were presented Lecture Recital. “Mazurkas Through Time”. Friday, February 1, 2013 at 8:00pm in Stamps Auditorium, Walgreen Center. The presentation considered how Mazurkas evolved from their roots as peasant dances through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and how the genre spread from Poland throughout Europe and the Americas. A selection of Mazurkas were performed from composers Maria Szymanowska, Frédéric Chopin, Alexander Scriabin, Claude Debussy, Enrique Granados, and Karol Szymanowski with analysis given to highlight the evolution of the Mazurka. Pedagogy Workshop. “Best Practices from Selected High-Performance Pre-College Piano Studios”. Sunday, April 21, 2013 in Room 2043, E. V. Moore Building. This presentation compared and contrasted six high-performance teachers who have developed high-performance studios in Classical piano performance. The presentation included many video segments from observations and interviews, and sought to reveal best practices for developing a high-performance studio. Recital. Sunday, April 28, 2013 in Britton Recital Hall, E. V. Moore Building. The recital explored solo piano and chamber music of living composers. The first half of the program included Five Bagatelles from Australian composer Carl Vine (b. 1954), Pieces for Piano by Canadian composer Alexina Louie (b. 1949), and Deux Études de Sonorité by Canadian composer François Morel (b. 1926). The second half was given in collaboration with Latitude 49, a new music ensemble. The recital included world-premieres of several pieces written specifically for Latitude 49, including The Duality of Nostalgia by Canadian/American composer Jared Miller (b. 1988), Detheracta by Canadian composer Eugene Astapov (b. 1989) and A Five-Note Chord, Seen From the Porch of a Curious Mind by American composer Garrett Schumann (b. 1987), in addition to a performance of Zaka by American composer Jennifer Higdon (b. 1962).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.508 | 0.329 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".