MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3162253863

Quantification des pertes en phosphore en milieu agricole - outil LoPhos.

2002· article· fr· W3162253863 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marie Larocque, Michel Patoine, Olivier Banton, Alain N. Rousseau, Pierre Lafrance

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada)) · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryHumanitiesPhysicsArtGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La contamination des cours d'eau par le phosphore (P) est une problématique de plus en plus préoccupante en milieu agricole. En 1998, le ministère de l'Environnement du Québec a subventionné le développement d'un outil de calcul des pertes de P à l'environnement en provenance des activités agricoles. L'outil développé s'appelle LoPhos et est applicable dans les conditions agro-clirnatiques du Québec. LoPhos utilise une approche basée sur des régressions linéaires et des coefficients de perte moyens. Cette approche a l'avantage d'utiliser directement les données les plus récentes de la littérature et d'intégrer l'ensemble des processus dominant les pertes de P en milieu agricole. Le présent article a pour objectif de présenter les relations mathématiques développées à partir des pertes de P mesurées sur des fermes sous différentes conditions, et intégrées dans l'outil LoPhos. Dans LoPhos, les pertes de P au champ par ruissellement, érosion, drainage et lessivage sont prises en compte. Les données de la littérature ont permis de développer des relations pour calculer distinctement l'effet du P épandu annuellement et du P contenu dans le sol. Une relation tenant compte de la rétention du P par les bandes riveraines a aussi été obtenue. Finalement, les pertes de P aux bâtiments en provenance des cours d'exercice, des amas de fumier, des sites de compostage, ainsi que les rejets de P dans les eaux usées de laiterie sont calculées à l'aide de coefficients. L'outil développé répond ainsi au besoin des professionnels qui doivent évaluer le risque de contamination associé à l'entreposage des fumiers, à la fertilisation et à la culture des sols. \n \n Abstract \nWater pollution by agricultural phosphorus (P) is an increasing concern problern in rural areas. ln 1998, the Quebec rninistry of Environrnent sponsored the developrnent of a tool to predict P losses to the environrnent frorn agricultural activities. The rnathernatical tool which was developed is narned LoPhos. lt uses an approach based on linear regressions and average loss coefficients, and is applicable to the agro-clirnatic conditions of the province of Quebec. This approach uses data frorn the rnost recent literature and integrates the rnost important processes involved in agricultural P losses. This paper presents the rnathernatical relations integrated in LoPhos and obtained frorn P losses rneasured on farrn under different conditions. This review provided ail the data necessary for developing LoPhos. ln this tool, P losses in the field corne frorn runoff, erosion, drainage and leaching. The available data frorn previous studies provide sufficient information to develop equations to calculate separately the effects of fertilizer P and of soil P. An equation taking into account P retention by riparian zones was also identified. Finally, P losses frorn exercise lots, rnanure piles, cornposting sites, as well as P tosses to the environrnent frorn dairy farrn wastewater are calculated using coefficients. LoPhos rneets the needs of professionals who must evaluate pollution risks associated with fertilization practices, soil cultivation and management of rnanure stocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada))→Same topicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics→French-language works237,207→