MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162428816 · doi:10.1097/jte.0000000000000182

Development and Evaluation of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Implementation Process in a Student-Led Pro Bono Clinic: Acceptability and Adoption

2021· article· en· W3162428816 on OpenAlexaff
Trevor Staples, Gillian Beran-Maryott, Alan Brinkerhoff, Misha Bradford, Robert S. Ward, Anne Thackeray

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Therapy Education · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsAthletic Edge Sports Medicine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowMedical educationMedicineAdaptation (eye)Process (computing)Context (archaeology)Function (biology)Outcome (game theory)Process managementPsychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose. Although patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly implemented to inform care and demonstrate the value of care across disciplines and settings, no previous reports have assessed PRO implementation and acceptability to student clinicians in a pro bono physical therapy clinic. The purpose of this case report was to describe the development and evaluation of an implementation process for an electronically administered PRO in a pro bono physical therapy clinic. Case Description. A student-faculty team used the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify barriers to PRO implementation in one student-run pro bono clinic and develop strategies to address identified barriers. The change management theoretical framework was used to develop an implementation process that addressed all general and local contextual needs. Acceptability and adoption of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF) computer adaptive test to student clinicians were assessed to evaluate implementation effectiveness. Outcomes. Implementation barriers included rotating student teams, limited knowledge, need for workflow modifications, and PRO translation to Spanish. Student clinician training, workflow adaptation, and use of English and Spanish versions of PROMIS PF addressed all barriers, general and local contextual needs. Student clinician responses suggested that implementation strategies were acceptable, citing increase efficiency and simplicity. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function adoption was 81% (per month range = 47–100%) over the 6-month implementation period. Discussion and Conclusion. Acceptance and adoption rates by student clinicians indicate that implementation of PROMIS PF was successful at improving PRO collection and influencing student clinician education about PROs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.087
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.120
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0870.120
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.586
Teacher spread0.433 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical Therapy EducationSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207