MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162510496 · doi:10.51896/atlante/lfrt8532

LA MOTIVACIÓN EN EL APRENDIZAJE DEL IDIOMA INGLÉS EN ESTUDIANTES UNIVERSITARIOS DE LA CIUDAD DE MEDELLÍN, COLOMBIA

2021· article· es· W3162510496 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julio Antonio Álvarez Martínez, Jony de Jesús Rojas Ochoa

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Teacher Training
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPersonaPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La motivación es un aspecto que le permite a una persona realizar una acción dirigida, de manera constante para alcanzar una meta; por tanto, es factor un determinante en la consecución de cualquier objetivo. Es así, como este artículo pretende identificar la relación entre la motivación y el aprendizaje del idioma inglés en estudiantes universitarios, analizando la incidencia de los tipos de motivación en su desempeño académico. A partir de un enfoque de investigación cuantitativo de tipo correlacional, de corte no experimental transversal; con una muestra de 524 estudiantes de dos instituciones universitarias: Universidad ECCI y la Corporación Universitaria Americana, de la ciudad de Medellín. Asimismo, se aplicaron dos cuestionarios, uno de evaluación motivacional del proceso de aprendizaje -EMPA- de 35 ítems, y otro de 22 ítems que tuvo como referencia la batería de actitud y motivación R.C. Gardner, University of Western Ontario. Como resultado se evidenció que existe una relación directa y positiva, con asociación débil entre la motivación y el aprendizaje del idioma inglés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos de Educación y DesarrolloSame topicEducation and Teacher TrainingFrench-language works237,207