MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162541368 · doi:10.1017/9781780687100.015

Canada: A Dual System of Evaluation

2018· book-chapter· en· W3162541368 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersentia eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestrictivenessForeign direct investmentPosition (finance)Index (typography)International economicsDual (grammatical number)BusinessEconomicsInternational tradeMacroeconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada is a country with an explicit official position in favour of FDI. Nevertheless, this positive attitude towards FDI does not prevent the country having a system for the evaluation of FDI proposals or certain limitations on FDI in several sectors of the economy, for example limitations on foreign ownership in the area of transport or telecommunications. In fact, in 2016, Canada ranked as one of the most restrictive developed countries in relation to FDI in the OECD FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index. The country is said to have a ‘mediocre record’ when it comes to FDI inflows. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT INVESTMENT CANADA ACT OF 1985, REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES FDI is governed in Canada by the Investment Canada Act of 1985 (ICA). Despite the explicit mandate to welcome FDI in section 2 ICA, the Act was in fact enacted to prevent US multinationals from controlling the Canadian economy. The ICA was for much of its history a sort of ‘rubber stamp’, a nuisance for foreign investors who wished to invest in Canada but not a real obstacle to investing or conducting business afterwards. However, the financial crisis, the rise of globalisation and the consequent acquisition of many iconic firms by foreigners have all fostered protectionist and nationalist sentiments in many countries and, in the case of Canada, has caused the ICA to slowly ‘grow teeth’. Recent reforms have also been apparently driven by the goal of preventing attempts by foreign firms – mainly Chinese firms – to gain significant presence in the Canadian economy, especially in the Canadian energy industry. The Act is complemented by the Regulations Respecting Investment in Canada (SOR/85-611), which set out the meaning of some of the notions found in the Act and supplement the procedure for notification and review, as well as by the Guidelines on the National Security Review of Investments (also referred to as the Guidelines – Investment by foreign state-owned enterprises – Net benefit assessment). ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE CANADIAN LEGISLATION Like in other countries, the complex system for the evaluation of FDI proposals in Canada exists in parallel to areas where FDI access is limited and with some pieces of legislation in other areas of law. For instance, competition law is also applicable to cross-border mergers and legislation on transport also affects FDI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.016
Science and technology studies0.0130.009
Scholarly communication0.0260.006
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntersentia eBooksSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207