Performance measurement of supply chains and distribution industry using balanced scorecard and fuzzy analysis network process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to identify effective indicators in the performance measurement of a firm using Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as well as weighting and ranking indicators by employing Fuzzy Analysis Network Process (FANP) and investigation on network mapping and the relationships between balanced scorecards with Fuzzy DEMATEL presenting strategies to improve performance of a firm. To assess the significance of the four perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes and learning and growth, about 28 indicators are identified, and after screening, 13 indicators are located as final BSC indicators. After examining the influencing of the main factors using fuzzy DEMATEL technique, internal processes dimension has the most impact and customer, and learning and growth and financial dimensions respectively are ranked as second to fourth priorities. Also using the Fuzzy ANP technique has examined weighting and ranking of dimension and performance measures indicators that dimension of customers has gained first rank and financial, internal processes and learning and growth are ranked as second to fourth respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it