MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162686655 · doi:10.1107/s0108767320098153

B-factor analysis suggests that <scp>L</scp>-lysine and <i>R</i>,<i>R</i>-bis-lysine allosterically inhibit Cj.DHDPS enzyme by decreasing its protein dynamics

2020· article· en· W3162686655 on OpenAlexaff
S. Saran, D.A.R. Sanders

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLysineEnzymeChemistryAllosteric regulationBiochemistryAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Campylobacter jejuni (Cj.) , dihydrodipicolinate synthase (DHDPS) catalyzes the condensation of pyruvate (pyr) and (S)-aspartate--semi-aldehyde (ASA) to form dihydrodipicolinate. Cj.DHDPS regulates an essential step in the biosynthesis of L-lysine (Lys) and meso-diaminopimelate in bacterial cell wall synthesis. In our study, the normalized B-factors calculated from crystallographic data suggested that Lys and synthetic bisLys inhibitors allosterically inhibit the enzyme by reducing mobility in the regions that undergo transient conformational fluctuations to facilitate the diffusion of substrate Pyr in the active site for catalysis, consistent with published HDX-MS dynamics studies. The normalized B-factors also showed that bisLys allosterically inhibits DHDPS Y110F lysine insensitive mutant by rigidifying these flexible regions. The B-factor analysis suggest that flexibility in the regions (8, 9, 10, 11, L20, and 12) may be vital for substrate turn over and catalysis. Normalized Bfactors of DHDPS and its Y110F mutant with and without inhibitors in different space groups showed similar flexibility patterns, suggesting the reliability of our B-factors analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207