MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162768907 · doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3078538

Drone-Based Ceramic Insulators Condition Monitoring

2021· article· en· W3162768907 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAmerican University of Sharjah
KeywordsQuadcopterDroneInsulator (electricity)EngineeringOverhead (engineering)Overhead lineCeramicReal-time computingComputer scienceElectrical engineeringSimulationAerospace engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article develops a prototype quadcopter drone-based system for inspection of power-line ceramic insulators. The drone uses its onboard cameras and Raspberry Pi single-board computer to monitor the health condition of outdoor ceramic insulators. The main contribution of this article is the development of a complete quadcopter-based system prototype for overhead power-line ceramic insulators inspection. The system is capable of performing the required computer vision routines for insulator health monitoring, either onboard or on an onshore ground station computer. In the onshore mode of operation, the drone captures images as it flies and simultaneously sends them to the onshore ground station. The developed system is tested in real life on a small-scale model frame, on which insulators are mounted. The results presented in this article show that quadcopter-based insulator inspection can be carried out successfully using both onshore and onboard computer vision techniques, with acceptable quality in terms of precision and computer vision time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it