Successful Rescue Intervention of Internal Mammary Artery Anastomotic Site Acute Graft Failure With Direct New Generation Covered Stenting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute, perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) from acute left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior descending (LAD) graft failure immediately following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is associated with significantly increased in-hospital mortality. The leading etiology of such acute graft failure is acute thrombosis, dissection, spasm, anastomosis failure or no-reflow phenomenon. Repeat bypass surgery carries incremental risk and may not be feasible in hemodynamically unstable patients. Traditional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with or without stent placement is sometimes used in such cases; however, graft anatomy and lesion location increase procedural complexity and challenge technical feasibility. This is particularly true of the LIMA to LAD graft anastomosis, where PCI carries the risk of anastomotic site perforation or avulsion. Therefore, the best revascularization strategy for such a lesion involving the LIMA to LAD graft anastomosis in the immediate perioperative period remains unknown. We present a case of 75-year-old male who suffered an acute MI complicated by cardiogenic shock less than 24 h after two-vessel CABG. Selective angiography revealed acute LIMA to LAD anastomotic site closure, posing a risk for perforation if treated with traditional angioplasty or stenting. We successfully performed rescue PCI, by directly deploying a PK Papyrus covered stent (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) across the anastomosis. Our case report describes the upfront (rather than a bail out) use of the new covered stent as a novel revascularization strategy to treat "perforation prone" LIMA to LAD anastomotic site acute graft failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".