MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Guided-Wave-Excited Binary Huygens’ Metasurfaces for Dynamic Radiated-Beam Shaping with Independent Gain and Scan-Angle Control

2021· article· en· W3162862509 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAperture (computer memory)OpticsTransmission (telecommunications)Reflection (computer programming)BiasingAmplitudeBeam (structure)AcousticsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a reconfigurable metasurface that is able to dynamically and independently control the gain and propagation direction of the radiated field, with reduced biasing complexity and power consumption at a low profile. Moreover, the proposed metasurface is guided-wave fed thus leading to a compact tunable leaky-waveguide structure. Heretofore, reported reconfigurable metasurfaces have mainly demonstrated dynamic tailoring of free-space waves by redistributing their reflection or transmission phase profiles at a fixed amplitude. In contrast, we demonstrate dynamic transformation of a guided wave into an aperture field with controlled amplitude such that the gain and scan angle of the corresponding radiated field are dynamically and independently controlled. In particular, the aperture field is digitally synthesized by the proposed tunable Huygens' metasurface whose local transmission coefficient is able to be dynamically tuned as two digital bits of $\ensuremath{-}|{T}_{o}|$ and $+|{T}_{o}|$, where ${T}_{o}$ represents a user-defined constant. This digital synthesis and the deliberate utilization of a nonbianisotropic type Huygens' metasurface simplify biasing requirements, and make the proposed design more feasible. Through simulations and experiments, we show dynamic steering of a beam from $\ensuremath{-}{40}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$ to $+{40}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$, and two broadside radiations with different radiation gains at a fixed operating frequency of 5 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it