MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3162912830 · doi:10.17533/udea.lyl.n79a29

La variación terminológica en textos fuente y sus traducciones: un estudio piloto

2021· article· es· W3162912830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juan Felipe Zuluaga Molina, Manuela Hernández Sánchez

Bibliographic record

VenueLingüística y Literatura · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
Topiclinguistics and terminology studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El interés por la traducción de este artículo, cuya autorización fue dada por los autores, la revista canadiense Meta [56(2), 318-335] y la editorial Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, surgió en el desarrollo del proyecto de investigación Variación terminológica vertical y horizontal en español: hacia una descripción lingüística de las unidades terminológicas desde la lingüística de corpus (VaTeHoVe), del grupo de investigación en Traducción y Nuevas Tecnologías (TNT), el cual fue aprobado para su financiación por medio del Acta del CODI (Comité para el Desarrollo de la Investigación) de la Universidad de Antioquia n.° 2018-22970 del 11 de julio de 2019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLingüística y LiteraturaSame topiclinguistics and terminology studiesFrench-language works237,207