Controlling of pandemic COVID-19 using optimal control theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2019, a new infectious disease called pandemic COVID-19 began to spread from Wuhan, China. In spite of the efforts to stop the disease, being out of the control of the governments it spread rapidly all over the world. From then on, much research has been done in the world with the aim of controlling this contagious disease. A mathematical model for modeling the spread of COVID-19 and also controlling the spread of the disease has been presented in this paper. We find the disease-free equilibrium points as trivial equilibrium (TE), virus absenteeism equilibrium (VAE) and virus incidence equilibrium (VIE) for the proposed model; and at the trivial equilibrium point for the presented dynamic system we obtain the Jacobian matrix so as to be used in finding the largest eigenvalue. Radius spectral method has been used for finding the reproductive number. In the following, by adding a controller to the model and also using the theory of optimal control, we can improve the performance of the model. We must have a correct understanding of the system i.e. how it works, the various variables affecting the system, and the interaction of the variables on each other. To search for the optimal values, we need to use an appropriate optimization method. Given the limitations and needs of the problem, the aim of the optimization is to find the best solutions, to find conditions that result in the maximum of susceptiblity, the minimum of infection, and optimal quarantination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".