MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163071599

Integrals of motion, turning points, and inertial points for orbits around spherical black-holes.

2021· preprint· en· W3163071599 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen C. Anco, Jordan Fazio

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRelativity and Gravitational Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeodesicSolving the geodesic equationsConserved quantityPhysicsOrbit (dynamics)Circular orbitClassical mechanicsInertial frame of referenceSchwarzschild radiusMathematical analysisMathematical physicsMathematicsGravitation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A locally conserved angular quantity is obtained for non-circular orbits of a massive particle around a spherical black hole. This quantity yields the angle in the spatial plane of motion at which an orbit has either a turning point or an inertial point. It is an analogue of the angle of the globally conserved Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector and Hamilton's binormal vector which exist in Newtonian gravity, with the important difference that the angle jumps at every turning point in the case of elliptic-like orbits that precess. This feature is shared by the angle of the locally conserved Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector and Hamilton's binormal vector in Newtonian gravity with a cubic correction. The angular quantity is derived as part of obtaining a complete set of integrals of motion for the timelike geodesic equations in Schwarzschild spacetime. In addition, a locally conserved temporal quantity and a locally conserved proper-time quantity are obtained from the derivation. The properties of these (new) locally conserved quantities are explained and illustrated for each type of non-circular orbit. Their existence is shown to be related to a group of hidden dynamical symmetries of the timelike geodesic equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicRelativity and Gravitational TheoryFrench-language works237,207