MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163310943 · doi:10.1093/ornithapp/duab016

Urban rooftop-nesting Common Nighthawk chicks tolerate high temperatures by hyperthermia with relatively low rates of evaporative water loss

2021· article· en· W3163310943 on OpenAlexaff
Gretchen N. Newberry, Ryan S. O’Connor, David L. Swanson

Bibliographic record

VenueOrnithological applications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersSouth Dakota Game, Fish and ParksUniversity of South Dakota
KeywordsRelative humidityEnvironmental scienceEvaporative coolerMicroclimateHumidityNest (protein structural motif)Animal scienceHeat stressUrban heat islandEcologyThermoregulationDewAtmospheric sciencesBiologyGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Heat tolerance for many birds under climate and land use change scenarios could be compromised in the future. Common Nighthawks (Chordeiles minor) belong to the Caprimulgiformes, a generally heat-tolerant order, but few studies have assessed heat tolerance in Caprimulgiform chicks, which might be particularly susceptible to heat stress. In the midwestern United States, nighthawks primarily nest on flat graveled rooftops in urban areas, as natural nesting habitats are limited. Urban rooftop-nesting nighthawks are likely exposed to higher environmental temperatures than birds nesting at more thermally buffered natural sites, and evaporative cooling might be impeded by the typically high summer humidity in their Midwest breeding range. This combination of heat and humidity might negatively impact heat tolerance of nighthawk chicks. We exposed 7- to 14-day-old nighthawk chicks (n = 15) from rooftop nests to ambient temperatures (Tas) up to 51°C and at typical summer dew points. Chicks initiated gular flutter at a mean ambient temperature of 42.4 ± 3.4°C (mean ± SE). Evaporative water loss (EWL) rates increased significantly with increasing temperature above 44.0 ± 1.5°C. Chicks showed little evidence of lower and upper bounds of the thermal neutral zone over the range of temperatures (30–44°C) for which we measured oxygen consumption. Body mass loss was significantly positively correlated with temperature during heat exposure trials. Chicks tolerated Tas up to 51°C and body temperatures (Tbs) up to 48°C, which, along with the high temperatures at which gular flutter and high rates of EWL were initiated, suggest that nighthawk chicks are tolerant of high ambient temperatures, even with relatively high humidity. Given the high rates of mass loss and high Tbs at hot ambient temperatures, chick heat tolerance mechanisms could be detrimental for rooftop-nesting nighthawks given projected increasing trends for both heat and humidity in the midwestern United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrnithological applicationsSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207