MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dietary Fiber Supplementation Normalizes Serum Metabolites of Adults with Overweight/Obesity in a 12‐Week Randomized Control Trial

2017· article· en· W3163471439 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shyamchand Mayengbam, Jennifer E. Lambert, Jill A. Parnell, Jasmine M. Tunnicliffe, Jay Han, Troy Sturzenegger, Hans J. Vogel, Jane Shearer, Raylene A. Reimer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture Food and Rural DevelopmentMount Royal UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeoxycholic acidDyslipidemiaFecesOverweightInternal medicineMedicineBile acidObesityGut floraEndocrinologyChemistryFood scienceBiochemistryBiologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity predisposes to the development of several metabolic insults such as glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia and hypertension. It is also associated with alterations in gut microbiota and their metabolites in humans. A growing body of evidence demonstrates the importance of dietary fiber in preventing and managing several metabolic diseases. The current study aimed to provide mechanistic insight into the potential beneficial effects of yellow pea fiber in treating obesity‐related metabolic dysfunctions. A total of 53 overweight and obese adults were randomly assigned to a pea fiber (PF, n=29) or control (CO, n=24) group for 12 weeks. The PF group received wafers containing 5g/serving of yellow pea fiber thrice a day, while the CO group received an isocaloric amount of control wafer with no fiber. Serum and fecal samples were collected at baseline and at the end of the study. We employed 1 H‐NMR spectroscopy and LC‐MS to analyse serum metabolites; and GC‐MS and HPLC‐DAD to analyse fecal short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and bile acids (BAs) respectively. Serum metabolomics analysis revealed impairments in acetylcarnitine, hexose, and certain glycerophsopholipids, SCFAs and amino acids concentrations in CO group which were not observed in the PF group compared to their baseline values. On the other hand, there was no significant change in fecal SCFAs and BAs in CO group. However, we found a significant increase in fecal acetate ( P =0.039) and significant decreases in fecal isovalerate ( P =0.015), cholic acid ( P =0.011), deoxycholic acid ( P =0.014) and total BAs ( P =0.042) content in the PF group compared to baseline. A pathway analysis indicated potential defects in the synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies, aminoacyl‐tRNA biosynthesis, glycerophospholipid metabolism, butanoate metabolism and glycine, serine and threonine metabolism in CO group which could be prevented by the addition of yellow pea fiber in the diet. Thus, the current study provided crucial mechanistic insight for the role of yellow pea fiber in the management of obesity and related diseases Support or Funding Information Alberta Innovates‐Health Solutions, Alberta Innovates‐Bio Solutions, Alberta Pulse Growers Commission; Eyes High Postdoctoral Fellowship

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207