MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163603622

황순원 소설에 투영된 근대의 풍경 -『신(神)들의 주사위』를 그 한 예로-

2003· article· ko· W3163603622 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이혜경

Bibliographic record

Venue한국문학이론과 비평 · 2003
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Systems and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernization theoryPower (physics)Order (exchange)CourageQuarter (Canadian coin)SociologyPeriod (music)DiceHistoryLawPolitical scienceAestheticsBusinessArtMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The courage which it opposes to a time may not so much lie in the glittering heroic act as in stubborn persistence, or in the acceptance changes. There have been moments in history when remarkable progress was made in relatively short periods of time. Also the modern time belongs in like that moment. The modem time with the customer menu of novel at character of transition period under appearing boiled specially. Is not exception even from Hwang, Sun Won's novel. To his work The Dice of Gods like this features appears well. The spirit back of family system, industrialization, and times with previously times is to appear with different features from his novel The Dice of Gods. The people of novel inside it follows in change of times and it lives it is going a new life. Individuals have several basic, life-sustaining needs that must be satisfied. The primary agents of community orientation in contemporary society are the family, the peer group, and the work. Like that features in order to feel a modern time more nearly. A country cannot develop its industrial power overnight. For a quarter of a century when the modernization should have been started really even from Korea passed. But the modernization as ever is in the process of advancing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue한국문학이론과 비평Same topicEducational Systems and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207