FRACTAL EVIDENCE OF REACTIVE TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA UNDER ACID GAS INJECTION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the geologic and soil science literature, the fractal model of porous systems abound. Consequently, any process, be it physicochemical or geomechanical that impacts pore structure will equally impact the fractal nature of the system. Several studies have reported the effect of physicochemical processes such as water–rock interations, on the fractal dimension of the porous system using different approaches involving sophisticated instrumentation. Others have also reported the effect of geomechanical processes such as compaction on fractal dimension using similar approaches. To the best of our knowledge, none or little has been reported regarding the use of multiphase flow hydraulic models for revealing the effect of water–rock interactions on the fractal dimension and pore size distribution of porous systems under acid gas injection. Consequently, to fill the knowledeg gap, data on two-phase flow of acid gas and brine in porous media have been used to show that the fractal dimension and pore size distribution of the porous system change in response to water–rock interactions. The bases of the study are hydraulic models integrating the pore size distribution index parameter that have intimate associations with fractal dimension. Most importantly, the results of this study show that data on two-phase flow in porous media involoving acid gas and brine can be used to show changes in the fractal nature of the porous system, consistent with measurements made using sophisticated methods for core analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it