MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163755361

UMSAE Workshop/Trailer Redesign and E4 Facility Layout

2013· article· en· W3163755361 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ashley Keep, Manmeet Matharo, Tyler Omichinski, Tyler Whettell, Vanjul Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrailerComputer scienceEngineeringAeronauticsAutomotive engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design project presented to our design team has three parts. The existing University of Manitoba Student Chapter of SAE International (UMSAE) workshop must be redesigned to improve the poor organization and work flow that is present. The UMSAE travel trailer must be redesigned, and a detailed universal loading scheme must be created to reduce trailer loading time and improve trailer organization when at competition. Finally, a building layout must be created for the Faculty of Engineering workspaces in the E4 building, a proposed addition to the existing EITC facility that will be shared with the Faculty of Architecture as an inclusive design center. This report presents the final recommended designs for each project section. The UMSAE workshop redesign uses a shelving system with colored totes to organize items and sort them between teams. The entire back room is used as a storage unit, which includes the installation of a sheet metal rack and chemical cabinets. Common tools are located on two color-coded shadow boards, which can be rolled to different locations depending on who requires them. Designated areas for team vehicles, tools, and storage are marked on the floor of the room to maintain workflow and travel lanes. Material disposal is defined with a simple flow chart and appropriate storage containers for each type of waste produced in the shop. The UMSAE trailer is redesigned with the addition of a shelving unit, hanging rack, tool chest, and folding workbench. The shelving unit is used as a place to store colored totes, which are organized into totes with objects common to all teams, and totes with team-specific objects. This improves loading speed and organization, as only the team-specific totes must be swapped out of the trailer. A set of hanging racks allows cords, ropes, and straps to be placed on the trailer walls. An integrated tool chest with a top work surface organizes tools effectively while providing a work surface for small assembly operations. If more work surface area is required, a folding table, attached to the trailer wall, can be extended beside the tool chest and to allow […]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207