MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3163759076

Towards a Genome-wide Fingerprint of Antibiotic Resistance Determinants in the Cystic Fibrosis Pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia K56-2

2021· article· en· W3163759076 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew M. Hogan, Lamprinos Frantzeskakis, Atif Ul Aftab, Silvia T. Cardona

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurkholderia cenocepaciaMicrobiologyBiologyAntibiotic resistanceBurkholderia cepacia complexAntibioticsAntimicrobialBurkholderiaGeneticsBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

People with cystic fibrosis experience re-occurring polymicrobial pulmonary infections that are a leading cause of mortality. Among the infecting organisms is the Gram-negative Burkholderia cenocepacia, which causes a rapidly progressing form of necrotizing pneumonia and bacteremia known as “cepacia syndrome”, with few treatment options due to high intrinsic antibiotic resistance. The application of next-generation sequencing has powered recent genome-wide explorations into antibiotic resistance. Here, we lay the foundation for such an exploration into the epidemic clinical isolate B. cenocepacia K56-2 with an in-depth survey into its resistance arsenal. We have characterized growth dose-response curves for a panel of 87 antimicrobials from over 30 diverse classes, including clinically relevant antibiotics. Despite many not causing full growth inhibition, we observed important differences and similarities in and among structural classes. For example, tetracyclines and quinolones were up to two orders of magnitude more potent than aminoglycosides and cationic peptides. Within the cephalosporins, while ceftazidime by itself has poor activity, the related siderophore conjugate, cefiderocol, possessed a 512-fold lower MIC. Furthermore, cross-reference to the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD 2020) explains many of the observed trends in antimicrobial activity. K56-2 putatively encodes over 250 unique known resistance genes, including carbapenemases, broad-spectrum efflux pumps, and outer membrane modification systems. Furthermore, we have constructed and validated a high-density barcoded transposon mutagenesis scheme to quantitatively profile genomic contributions to antimicrobial resistance. At sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics, hypersusceptible mutants will be selectively killed, which can be monitored by next-generation sequencing and enumeration of unique DNA barcodes in each mutant. Current efforts are focused on cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem, and aztreonam; however, our high-throughput platform, will allow us to profile all 87 antimicrobials in the panel. We expect these studies to yield valuable insight into novel therapeutic avenues for treating infections caused by B. cenocepacia and related bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances→French-language works237,207→