MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163781417 · doi:10.1017/9781780687520.008

Granting of Shale Gas Licences, Land Access and Property Rights in North America

2018· book-chapter· en· W3163781417 on OpenAlexaff
Alastair R. Lucas, Simone Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersentia eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProperty rightsShale gasPetroleum industryResource (disambiguation)BusinessFossil fuelPetroleum engineeringUnconventional oilNatural resource economicsProperty (philosophy)Oil shalePolitical scienceLaw and economicsLawEngineeringEconomicsWaste managementEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter considers the nature of property rights granted to industry operators and the property rights of landowners, as well as presenting a picture of North American regulatory systems for shale resource development. In this review, focus is mainly on what can be described as ‘mature’ oil and gas jurisdictions – those that have a history of oil and gas development, appropriate legal and regulatory frameworks, and at least some citizen experience with and understanding of the oil and gas industry. This is by contrast with ‘new’ potential shale oil and gas jurisdictions that lack this history, law regulatory expertise and experience, and citizen experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntersentia eBooksSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207