Probing the Structural Basis of Citrus Phytochrome B using Computational Modelling and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Phytochromes (Phys) are known as red/far-red light photoreceptors and are responsible for directing the photosensory responses across the species, majorly from fungal, bacterial and plant kingdoms. Such responses majorly include photosynthetic potential and pigmentation in bacteria, whereas in a plant, they are involved in chloroplast development and photomorphogenesis. Many prokaryotic Phys have been modelled for their structural and functional analysis, but their plant counterparts have not been explored yet. To date, only the crystal structures of the photo-sensing module (PSM) of PhyB isoform from Arabidopsis thaliana and Glycine max have been resolved experimentally. Thus, in this study, we elucidated the complete 3D structure of Citrus PhyB. Initially, the structure and organisation of the Citrus PhyB have been predicted computationally, which were found to have the same domain organisation as A. thaliana and G. max PhyBs, yet their considerable distinct structural difference indicated potential divergence in signaling and functioning. Therefore, to evaluate the structural and functional implications of Citrus PhyB, we compared its structure with A. thaliana and G. max PhyBs using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation approaches. The modeling studies revealed that the region of Citrus PhyB-GAF domain possibly contributes to the variations between Citrus, A. thaliana and G. max PhyBs structures/functions. Hence, structural and molecular insights into Citrus PhyB can help to discover the Phys signaling and thus, an essential framework can be designed for optogenetic reagents and various agricultural/horticulture benefits. One sentence summary A complete Citrus PhyB structure together with photo-sensory and out-put modules provides significant information to evaluate its biological activities for agricultural benefits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".