MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163805048 · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8373

Applied and Computational Mathematics Division :

2021· report· en· W3163805048 on OpenAlexafffund
Ronald F. Boisvert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaBinghamton UniversityUniversity of California, Los AngelesShanghaiTech UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversiteit AntwerpenUniversità di BolognaTechnische Universität BerlinUniversidade de LisboaUniversity of California, San DiegoOulun YliopistoYale UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New South WalesUniversitat de ValènciaUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonRollins CollegeUniversity of LimerickUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of OregonUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraIowa State UniversityAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgSveučilište u ZagrebuUniversity of KentuckyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonPrinceton UniversityUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyUniversity of AkronUniversity of WyomingPurdue UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaKungliga Tekniska HögskolanState University of New YorkInformation Technology LaboratoryUniversity of Central Florida
KeywordsDivision (mathematics)NISTWork (physics)Library scienceComputer scienceOperations researchEngineering managementData scienceEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineeringArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report summarizes recent technical work of the Applied and Computational Sciences Division of the Information Technology Laboratory at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Part I (Overview) provides a high-level overview of the Division's activities, including highlights of technical accomplishments during the previous year. Part II (Features) provides further details on projects of particular note this year. This is followed in Part III (Project Summaries) by brief synopses of all technical projects active during the past year. Part IV (Activity Data) provides listings of publications, technical talks, and other professional activities in which Division staff members have participated. The reporting period covered by this document is October 2019 through December 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.280
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207