MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3163848477 · doi:10.18280/rcma.310201

Effect of the Properties of Chalcopyrite Semiconductors on the Physical and Optical Parameters of Cell Layers with CIGS

2021· article· en· W3163848477 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Merwan Rachedi, A.E. Merad, Giulio Lorenzini, Hijaz Ahmad, Younes Menni, Houari Ameur, Ibtissem Sifi

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopper indium gallium selenide solar cellsPhotovoltaic systemMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsChalcopyriteSolar cellOpen-circuit voltageEnergy conversion efficiencyShort circuitSemiconductorLayer (electronics)VoltageCurrent densityElectronic engineeringEngineering physicsElectrical engineeringNanotechnologyEngineeringMetallurgyCopperPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the impact of various buffers of applying components on the effectiveness of CuInGaSe2 solar cells is studied numerically. The SCAPS software is employed to achieve the investigation. The main parameters of the inspected devices are: the photovoltaic conversion effectiveness (η), the filling factor (FF), short-circuit current (Jsc), and open circuit voltage (Voc). These photovoltaic parameters are analyzed vs. the thickness in the various buffer layers under study. The numerical findings revealed that the most significant conversion effectiveness (23.4%) of the CIGS solar cell is obtained with the CdS buffer layer. An attempt is conducted to improve this efficiency by using the SCAPS and by optimizing the two electrical and technological parameters of the three layers (ZnO, CdS, CIGS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancésSame topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207