Construction Management Project Delivery Method: A Case Study of the Centre Block Rehabilitation Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Buildings are no longer solely designed and the building of them overseen by architects during their construction. In a slow evolution over decades, the overall building process has transformed into a collaborative design system that engages construction management companies and consultants who work together (along with their clients) in a true integrated process. Such a comprehensive process is most applicable when it comes to heritage restoration projects. Heritage buildings typically have an extra layer of regulation since they have an underlying site and historical value that creates limitations during construction even when they are kept and restored or renovated. Such buildings, most of which are comprised of layered histories, must eventually function effectively to allow for the building’s new intended use. During a historical project rehabilitation, conflicting decisions are often made to balance the historical built fabric with the modern building’s requirements. The historical value and its intended use – combined with the complexity of today’s building expectations and program logistics – influence and deeply underlie the overall building design process. This thesis intends to explore this modern process of integrated design on a specific heritage rehabilitation project: the Canadian Parliament Precinct’s Centre Block. Located in the capital city of Ottawa, Centre Block is a national historical building and icon which is part of the Canadian parliamentary complex on Parliament Hill and one of the three buildings which forms the famous Parliamentary Triad. The focus of this thesis is on how modern construction methodology, typically through a construction management contract of some form, has redefined the role of the architect and the process of design development for large complex projects like Centre Block, as well as all of the building in the Parliamentary Precinct. Buildings, and especially historic buildings, in today’s society must incorporate multi-disciplined modern building and functional specifications that work together in harmony with the historical value of the building to form a concise design vision and, very importantly, one that can be implemented effectively and on budget.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".