Structural and phylogenetic analyses of resistance to next-generation aminoglycosides conferred by AAC(2′) enzymes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plazomicin is currently the only next-generation aminoglycoside approved for clinical use that has the potential of evading the effects of widespread enzymatic resistance factors. However, plazomicin is still susceptible to the action of the resistance enzyme AAC(2')-Ia from Providencia stuartii. As the clinical use of plazomicin begins to increase, the spread of resistance factors will undoubtedly accelerate, rendering this aminoglycoside increasingly obsolete. Understanding resistance to plazomicin is an important step to ensure this aminoglycoside remains a viable treatment option for the foreseeable future. Here, we present three crystal structures of AAC(2')-Ia from P. stuartii, two in complex with acetylated aminoglycosides tobramycin and netilmicin, and one in complex with a non-substrate aminoglycoside, amikacin. Together, with our previously reported AAC(2')-Ia-acetylated plazomicin complex, these structures outline AAC(2')-Ia's specificity for a wide range of aminoglycosides. Additionally, our survey of AAC(2')-I homologues highlights the conservation of residues predicted to be involved in aminoglycoside binding, and identifies the presence of plasmid-encoded enzymes in environmental strains that confer resistance to the latest next-generation aminoglycoside. These results forecast the likely spread of plazomicin resistance and highlight the urgency for advancements in next-generation aminoglycoside design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".