Self-Calibration of the Offset Between GPS and Semantic Map Frames for Robust Localization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In self-driving, standalone GPS is generally considered to have insufficient positioning accuracy to stay in lane. Instead, many turn to LIDAR localization, but this comes at the expense of building LIDAR maps that can be costly to maintain. Another possibility is to use semantic cues such as lane lines and traffic lights to achieve localization, but these are usually not continuously visible. This issue can be remedied by combining semantic cues with GPS to fill in the gaps. However, due to elapsed time between mapping and localization, the live GPS frame can be offset from the semantic map frame, requiring calibration. In this paper, we propose a robust semantic localization algorithm that self-calibrates for the offset between the live GPS and semantic map frames by exploiting common semantic cues, including traffic lights and lane markings. We formulate the problem using a modified Iterated Extended Kalman Filter, which incorporates GPS and camera images for semantic cue detection via Convolutional Neural Networks. Experimental results show that our proposed algorithm achieves decimetre-level accuracy comparable to typical LIDAR localization performance and is robust against sparse semantic features and frequent GPS dropouts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".