MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164278900 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-41004/v1

Prognostic Role of Preoperative C-Reactive Protein in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy - An Updated Meta-Analysis

2020· preprint· en· W3164278900 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaoyuan Qian, Can Qian, Jiaqiao Zhang, Yuchao Lu, Zhixian Wang, Qing Wang, Yang Xun, Yuanyuan Yang, Shaogang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrothelial carcinomaUrologyMedicineMeta-analysisOncologyInternal medicineCancerBladder cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase protein that is mainly stimulated by the inflammation-associated cytokines and high concentrations of CRP have been detected in many tumors. Many studies have shown that there is a close correlation between CRP and the prognosis of upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC). However, the prognosis significance of CRP in UTUC is still controversial. Our study aims to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between CRP and the prognostic value for UTUC undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods : A comprehensive electronic database search, using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, was performed to identify relevant research articles published before April 2020. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were established to extract data. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of all candidate studies. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CCS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated to evaluate the intensity of association. And heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Moreover, to ensure the stability of the analysis results, a sensitivity analysis was tested. All data were analyzed by Stata 15.0 and Review Manager 5.3. Results: Thirteen studies including a total of 2801 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. Our results verified that elevated CRP predicted poorer FRS (pooled HR=1.38, 95%CIs:1.12-1.71, P=0.003), CCS (pooled HR=1.64, 95%CI:1.38-1.94, P<0.001), OS (pooled HR=1.35, 95%CIs: 1.03-1.79 ,P=0.03) in patients with UTUC after RNU. Besides, elevated CRP was overtly correlated with tumor pathological stage (T3/T4 vs. ≤T2: OR=3.40, 95% CIs 2.39-4.84, P<0.001), tumor grade ((1/2 vs. 3: OR=1.68, 95% CIs 1.24-2.28, P<0.001), lymph node involvement (LNI) (+ vs. -: OR=2.73, 95% CIs 1.80-4.14, P<0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (+ vs. -: OR=4.1, 95% CIs 2.26-7.44, P<0.001). And these results got after using sensitivity analysis were verified to be stable and reliable. Furthermore, Begg's test result (RFS: P=0.089, CCS: P=0.592, and OS: P=0.089) showed no significant publication bias in the procedure. Conclusion: Elevated CRP indicates a poor prognosis for patients with UTUC undergoing RNU. Elevated CRP plays a significant role in reasonable risk stratification and individualized treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207