Organocatalyzed Oxa-Diels–Alder Reactions: Recent Progress
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The oxa-Diels–Alder reaction is a straightforward, atom-economical process for the construction of six-membered oxacycles, which are privileged structures due to their very common occurrence in several pharmaceuticals and natural products. As with many other asymmetric transformations, organocatalysis provides an elegant pathway to their synthesis via [4+2] annulation under mild reaction conditions. The oxa-Diels–Alder reaction utilizes either an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl as an oxa-diene with a suitable dienophile or a simple carbonyl as a dienophile with other dienes. A range of organocatalysts has been explored in the past decade to execute this strategy. The catalysts induce stereoselectivities via two basic reactivities: (1) The formation of chiral intermediates, or (2) selectively activating suitable reactants via a transition state. The present short review compiles organocatalyzed asymmetric oxa-Diels–Alder reactions published over the last ten years, along with detailed discussions on mechanistic approaches. 1 Introduction 2 Catalysis through Covalent Activation 2.1 N-Heterocyclic Carbenes 2.2 Amines 2.3 Isothiourea Catalysis 2.4 Phosphines 3 Catalysis through Non-Covalent Activation 3.1 Bifunctional Amines 3.2 Brønsted Acids 3.3 Guanidines 4 Multicatalysis through Both Covalent and Non-Covalent Activation 5 Conclusion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it