MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164449140 · doi:10.18280/ria.350206

AksharaNet: A GPU Accelerated Modified Depth-Wise Separable Convolution for Kannada Text Classification

2021· article· en· W3164449140 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shahzia Siddiqua, C. Naveena, Sunilkumar S. Manvi, Manjunath Aradhya

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkGrayscaleConvolution (computer science)Character (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)KannadaSearch engine indexingDeep learningScale (ratio)Key (lock)Artificial neural networkImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For content-based indexing and retrieval applications, text characters embedded in images are a rich source of information. Owing to their different shapes, grayscale values, and dynamic backgrounds, these text characters in scene images are difficult to detect and classify. The complexity increases when the text involved is a vernacular language like Kannada. Despite advances in deep learning neural networks (DLNN), there is a dearth of fast and effective models to classify scene text images and the availability of a large-scale Kannada scene character dataset to train them. In this paper, two key contributions are proposed, AksharaNet, a graphical processing unit (GPU) accelerated modified convolution neural network architecture consisting of linearly inverted depth-wise separable convolutions and a Kannada Scene Individual Character (KSIC) dataset which is grounds-up curated consisting of 46,800 images. From results it is observed AksharaNet outperforms four other well-established models by 1.5% on CPU and 1.9% on GPU. The result can be directly attributed to the quality of the developed KSIC dataset. Early stopping decisions at 25% and 50% epoch with good and bad accuracies for complex and light models are discussed. Also, useful findings concerning learning rate drop factor and its ideal application period for application are enumerated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesFrench-language works237,207