Sub-Planck structures: Analogies between the Heisenberg-Weyl and SU(2) groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coherent-state superpositions are of great importance for many quantum subjects, ranging from foundational to technological, e.g., from tests of collapse models to quantum metrology. Here we explore various aspects of these states, related to the connection between sub-Planck structures present in their Wigner function and their sensitivity to displacements (ultimately determining their metrological potential). We review this for the usual Heisenberg-Weyl algebra associated with a harmonic oscillator and extend it to find analogous results for the $\mathrm{su}(2)$ algebra, typically associated with angular momentum. In particular, in the Heisenberg-Weyl case, we identify phase-space structures with support smaller than the Planck action in both Schr\"odinger-cat-state mixtures and superpositions, the latter known as compass states. However, as compared to coherent states, compass states are shown to have $\sqrt{N}$-enhanced sensitivity against displacements in all phase-space directions ($N$ is the average number of quanta), whereas cat states and cat mixtures show such enhanced sensitivity only for displacements in specific directions. We then show that these same properties apply for analogous SU(2) states provided (i) coherent states are restricted to the equator of the sphere that plays the role of phase space for this group, (ii) we associate the role of the Planck action with the size of SU(2) coherent states in such a sphere, and (iii) we associate the role of $N$ with the total angular momentum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".