Conceptual Framework for Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using Physical, Experimental and Machine Learning Based Approaches in Coastal Aquifers of India
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exploitation of coastal aquifers results in intrusion of seawater and optimal management of coastal aquifers focuses mainly on adopting good operational strategies to contain aquifer salinity within a mandated limit, while simultaneously meeting the demand for water supply/recharge. Management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers is thus a critical issue of modern times. In this study, we present a theoretical framework for assessing the groundwater vulnerability in coastal aquifers of India using physical, experimental, and machine learning-based approaches. The developed framework suggests the use of 2D experiment for understanding the saltwater intrusion processes and fate and transport of contaminants like fluoride and arsenic. Further, the obtained parameters from the 2D experiments will be used to develop a numerical model using a physical-based simulator (SEAWAT). Lastly, the physical-based simulator will be replaced by a machine learning-based model and later will be coupled with optimization approaches to solve the groundwater management problem in coastal aquifers. The suggested framework will be useful in developing the strategies for minimization of saltwater intrusion or maximization of freshwater pumping in coastal zones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it