Enhanced MOPITT data coverage through cloud detection improvement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) satellite instrument has been measuring global tropospheric carbon monoxide (CO) since March 2000, providing the longest nearly continuous record of CO from space. During its long mission the data processing algorithms have been updated to improve the quality of CO retrievals and the sensitivity to the lower troposphere. Currently, MOPITT retrievals are only performed for clear-sky observations or over low clouds for ocean scenes. Compared to all observed radiances, successful retrieval rates are about 30 % and 40 % between 90° S–90° N and 60° S–60° N, respectively. Spatial seasonal variations show that while MOPITT data coverage in some places reaches 30 % in summer, this number can drop to less than 10 % in winter due to significantly increased cloud cover. Therefore, we investigate the current MOPITT cloud detection algorithm and consider approaches to increase the data coverage. The MOPITT CO total column (TC) data were modified by turning off the cloud detection scheme to allow a CO retrieval result regardless of their cloud status. Analyses of the standard CO TC product (cloud filtered) and non-standard product (non-cloud masked) were conducted for selected days. Results showed some coherent structures that were observed frequently in the non-masked CO product that were not present in the standard product and could potentially be actual CO features. A corresponding analysis of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer(MODIS) cloud height and cloud mask products along with MOPITT cloud flag descriptors was conducted in order to understand the cloud conditions present for these apparently physical CO features. Results show that a significant number of low cloud CO retrievals were rejected in the standard product. Those missing areas match the coherent patterns that were detected in the non-masked CO product. Many times, these structures were also seen in the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) CO TC product indicating actual CO plumes. Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) data on the Terra satellite were also employed for cloud height comparison with MODIS. Comparisons of MODIS and MISR cloud height data indicate remarkable agreement which is encouraging for the possibility of incorporating MODIS cloud height in the MOPITT cloud detection scheme. Statistics of the global assessment of the potential use of MODIS cloud height shows that MOPITT data increases significantly when cloud heights less than 2 km in height are incorporated in the retrievals. However quality indices should be defined and produced to ensure sufficient retrieval quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".