Antioxidant and enzyme-inhibitory properties of sesame seed protein fractions and their isolate and hydrolyzate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sesame seed was defatted and subsequently fractionated into albumin, globulin, glutelin and prolamin. The defatted flour was also subjected to alkaline solubilization and acid precipitation to obtain protein isolate. The sesame seed protein isolate was hydrolyzed using a combination of pepsin and pancreatin to produce the protein hydrolyzate. The defatted flour, protein fractions, isolate and hydrolyzate were evaluated for their amino acid profiles as well as in vitro antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities. The results showed that the glutelin fraction had higher amounts of essential amino acid (38.1%) when compared with albumin (35.6%), globulin (31.3%), prolamin (37.1%), protein isolate (37.1%) and protein hydrolyzate (36.7%). The defatted flour exhibited the strongest DPPH radical scavenging activity while only the globulin, isolate and hydrolyzate exhibited superoxide radical scavenging activity. The defatted flour also had the strongest hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of 91.79%, although lower than the 95.93% for the control peptide (glutathione). The hydrolyzate had the strongest metal chelating activity (75.53%), while the isolate had the highest ferric antioxidant reducing power. The albumin was the most effective inhibitor of angiotensin converting enzyme and α-amylase with values of 30.04% and 29.44%, respectively. In contrast, renin activity was strongly inhibited (89.87%) by the isolate but acetylcholinesterase was weakly inhibited by the hydrolyzate (16.89%) and prolamin (16.29%). We conclude that the defatted flour and protein products are potential ingredients that could be incorporated into foods to extend shelf-life but also with potential bioactive properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".