Two Imported Cases of New Variant COVID-19 First Emerging from Brazil — Guangdong Province, China, April 30, 2021
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On April 15, 2021, a 62-year-old male (Patient A, XG4122) and a 58-year-old female (Patient B, XG4123) travelled from Canada via airplane and were transferred to a central isolation hotel after being tested by the laboratory of Guangzhou Customs using nose swab tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The results for both patients returned COVID-19 positive and the couple were transported to the Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital for isolated treatment by ambulance on April 16, 2021. Patient A had inflamed lungs while Patient B had mild inflammation in her lungs according to the chest computed tomography (CT) examination. Both of their 28 close contacts underwent centralized isolation and medical observation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it