MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164752133 · doi:10.1080/15548627.2021.1936932

Silencing PEX26 as an unconventional mode to kill drug-resistant cancer cells and forestall drug resistance

2021· article· en· W3164752133 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael S. Dahabieh, Fan Huang, Christophe Gonçalves, Raúl Ernesto Flores González, Sathyen A. Prabhu, Alicia M. Bolt, Erminia Di Pietro, Elie Khoury, John A. Heath, Ziyi Xu, Joelle Rémy-Sarrazin, Koren K. Mann, Alexandre Orthwein, François‐Michel Boisvert, Nancy Braverman, Wilson H. Miller, Sonia V. del Rincón

Bibliographic record

VenueAutophagy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Cancer SocietyCancer Research SocietyCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRéseau de cancérologie RossyIsrael Cancer Research Fund
KeywordsBiologyAutophagyCancer researchAutophagosomeCancer cellATG5Gene silencingCell biologyCancerApoptosisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Promoting the macroautophagy/autophagy-mediated degradation of specific proteins and organelles can potentially be utilized to induce apoptosis in cancer cells or sensitize tumor cells to therapy. To examine this concept, we enriched for autophagosomes from histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi)-sensitive U937 lymphoma cells and isogenic HDACi-resistant cells. Mass spectrometry on autophagosome-enriched fractions revealed that HDACi-resistant cells undergo elevated pexophagy, or autophagy of the peroxisome, an organelle that supports tumor growth. To disturb peroxisome homeostasis, we enhanced pexophagy in HDACi-resistant cells via genetic silencing of peroxisome exportomer complex components (PEX1, PEX6, or PEX26). This consequently sensitized resistant cells to HDACi-mediated apoptosis, which was rescued by inhibiting ATM/ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM serine/threonine kinase), a mediator of pexophagy. We subsequently engineered melanoma cells to stably repress PEX26 using CRISPR interference (CRISPRi). Melanoma cells with repressed PEX26 expression showed evidence of both increased pexophagy and peroxisomal matrix protein import defects versus single guide scrambled (sgSCR) controls. In vivo studies showed that sgPEX26 melanoma xenografts recurred less compared to sgSCR xenografts, following the development of resistance to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-targeted therapy. Finally, prognostic analysis of publicly available datasets showed that low expression levels of PEX26, PEX6 and MTOR, were significantly associated with prolonged patient survival in lymphoma, lung cancer and melanoma cohorts. Our work highlighted that drugs designed to disrupt peroxisome homeostasis may serve as unconventional therapies to combat therapy resistance in cancer.Abbreviations: ABCD3/PMP70: ATP binding cassette subfamily D member 3; ACOX1: acyl-CoA oxidase 1; AP: autophagosome; COX: cytochrome c oxidase; CQ: chloroquine; CRISPRi: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats interference; DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; GO: gene ontology; dCas9: Cas9 endonuclease dead, or dead Cas9; HDACi: histone deacetylase inhibitors; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; LAMP2: lysosomal associated membrane protein 2; LCFAs: long-chain fatty acids; LFQ-MS: label-free quantitation mass spectrometry; LPC: lysophoshatidylcholine; MAP1LC3B/LC3B: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta; MTOR: mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase; PBD: peroxisome biogenesis disorders; PTS1: peroxisomal targeting signal 1; ROS: reactive oxygen species; sgRNA: single guide RNA; VLCFAs: very-long chain fatty acids; Vor: vorinostat; WO: wash-off.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAutophagySame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207