MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Artisanal Production of Prefusion-Stabilized SARS-CoV-2 Spikes v1

2021· preprint· en· W3164802666 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-François Rivest, Claudia Goupil, Yannick Doyon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecombinant DNACell cultureDownstream processingChemistryHEK 293 cellsCoronavirusBiologyMolecular biologyCell biologyBiochemistryCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The two-part protocol presented here describes the establishment of a stable pool of 293-F cells expressing the HexaPro variant of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) spike (S) protein and its production and purification from the culture medium. CRISPR-Cas9-driven targeted integration of the expression cassette at the AAVS1 safe harborlocus streamlines cell line production. Engineered 293-F cells grown as suspension cultures in animal origin-free, chemically defined, protein-free medium allow purification to be performed directly from the culture medium with minimal cell processing steps. Yields of native and purified Spikes typically average 30-50 mg per liter of culture medium following tandem affinity purification using nickel-coupled and Strep-Tactin resins. Purified proteins bind recombinant ACE2 and mAb CR3022 in ELISA-based assays. Establishing an engineered cell line from cryopreserved 293-F cells takes approximately 4 weeks, and subsequent production and purification take between 9 and 14 days. As shown for the D614G mutation, this system can be readily adapted to study Spike variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→