MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Highly Accurate Automated Patient-Specific 3D Bone Pose and Scale Estimation Using Bi-Planar Pose-Invariant Patches in a CNN-Based 3D/2D Registration Framework

2021· article· en· W3164884303 on OpenAlexaff
Nahid Babazadeh Khameneh, Carlos Vázquez, Thierry Cresson, Frédéric Lavoie, Jacques A. de Guise

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoseArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSegmentationPlanarComputer visionInvariant (physics)3D pose estimationIsotropySimilarity (geometry)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsImage (mathematics)Computer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an automatic CNN-based 3D/2D registration method to achieve highly accurate and robust seven degrees of freedom (7DOF) pose and isotropic scale of a generic 3D model. This step is a key enabler for reconstructing a patient-specific 3D bone surface model from a wide range of EOS® 2D bi-planar X-rays acquired with various fields of view and patients' orientations. Based on a coarse-to-fine strategy, first a CNN-based semantic segmentation followed by a PCA-based registration are used to roughly locate the bone. Similarity in pose-invariant local patches using CNN regression models is used to refine the 3D pose. The accuracy of the method is validated on 60 bi-planar X-rays. The mean of Mean Absolute pose Errors (MAE) of 3D translations, 3D rotations, and isotropic scaling are 0.19 mm, 0.33°, and 0.05 (%), respectively. The success rate is of 100 % at MAE lower than 1 mm, 1°, and 0.1 (%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207