MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dual Glycolate Oxidase/Lactate Dehydrogenase A Inhibitors for Primary Hyperoxaluria

2021· article· en· W3164906921 on OpenAlexaff
J. Ding, R. Gumpena, Marc-Olivier Boily, Alexandre Caron, Oliver Chong, Jennifer H. Cox, Valérie Dumais, Samuel Gaudreault, Aaron H. Graff, Andrew G. King, John Knight, Renata M. Oballa, Jayakumar Surendradoss, Tim Tang, Joyce Wu, W. Todd Lowther, David Powell

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsAcuitas Therapeutics (Canada)
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsIn vivoLactate dehydrogenaseOxalateChemistryPrimary hyperoxaluriaPharmacologyBiochemistryEnzymeMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Both glycolate oxidase (GO) and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) influence the endogenous synthesis of oxalate and are clinically validated targets for treatment of primary hyperoxaluria (PH). We investigated whether dual inhibition of GO and LDHA may provide advantage over single agents in treating PH. Utilizing a structure-based drug design (SBDD) approach, we developed a series of novel, potent, dual GO/LDHA inhibitors. X-ray crystal structures of compound 15 bound to individual GO and LDHA proteins validated our SBDD strategy. Dual inhibitor 7 demonstrated an IC50 of 88 nM for oxalate reduction in an Agxt-knockdown mouse hepatocyte assay. Limited by poor liver exposure, this series of dual inhibitors failed to demonstrate significant PD modulation in an in vivo mouse model. This work highlights the challenges in optimizing in vivo liver exposures for diacid containing compounds and limited benefit seen with dual GO/LDHA inhibitors over single agents alone in an in vitro setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Medicinal Chemistry LettersSame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207