MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165062305 · doi:10.1111/imr.12980

Fantastic IgA plasma cells and where to find them

2021· review· en· W3165062305 on OpenAlexafffund
Baweleta Isho, Alexandra Florescu, A. Wang, Jennifer L. Gommerman

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunological Reviews · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMultiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
KeywordsImmunoglobulin ALamina propriaImmunologyEffectorImmune systemBiologyMucosal immunityHomeostasisSecretory IgAInflammationFunction (biology)Mucous membraneImmunityCell biologyImmunoglobulin GGeneticsEpithelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract IgA is produced in large quantities at mucosal surfaces by IgA + plasma cells (PC), protecting the host from pathogens, and restricting commensal access to the subepithelium. It is becoming increasingly appreciated that IgA + PC are not constrained to mucosal barrier sites. Rather, IgA + PC may leave these sites where they provide both host defense and immunoregulatory function. In this review, we will outline how IgA + PC are generated within the mucosae and how they subsequently migrate to their “classical” effector site, the gut lamina propria. From there we provide examples of IgA + PC displacement from the gut to other parts of the body, referencing examples during homeostasis and inflammation. Lastly, we will speculate on mechanisms of IgA + PC displacement to other tissues. Our aim is to provide a new perspective on how IgA + PC are truly fantastic beasts of the immune system and identify new places to find them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunological ReviewsSame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207