Atrial fibrillation substrate mapping with decrement evoked potential mapping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Sociedad Española de Cardiologia. OnBehalf DEFINE-AF Background Identifying and targeting atrial substrate zones that are vulnerable to unidirectional block and slow conduction may be critical to improve the outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Functional mapping of the atrial substrate with Decrement Evoked Potential (DeEP) and a single extrastimulus in this population could potentially lead to novel therapeutic strategies. Aim 1) To systematically analyze whether the DEEP are present in the atrial tissue and their locations after pulmonary vein isolation. 2) To assess their relationship with the underlying voltage. 3) To assess the presence of DEEP as a function of the subtype of AF. Methods Consecutive patients with AF undergoing ablation were prospectively enrolled at 3 institutions. A biatrial voltage map was created and after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). A drive train and an extrastimulus (atrial refractory period + 20ms) was delivered from an epicardial site (proximal CS) and an endocardial site (left atrial appendage (LAA). A multipolar mapping catheter was sequentially placed at 8 left atrial sites and 5 right atrial sites. Electrograms (EGMs) that showed a local delay of >10ms in activation with the extrastimulus were identified as DEEPs. Patients were followed for a mean of 11 ± 5 months Results 74 patients, 63 pers AF (85%), mean age 62 ± 8, mean LA size 41 ±12 mm were enrolled. Of 19240 EGMs analyzed, 8.2% showed DEEPs (54.6% with CS pacing and 45.4% with LAA pacing, p = 0.0001). The mean local decrement seen was 39 ms. Most DEEPs (76.2%) were identified in sites with a normal EGM at baseline with preserved voltages. DEEPs were differentially distributed within the regions mapped, more frequently in LA than RA (9.2% vs 6.6%, p < 0.0001). Patients with persistent AF had a higher proportion of DEEPs than patients with paroxysmal AF (9.7% vs 5.1%, p < 0.001). Conclusions Atrial DEEPs are: 1) More often identified when pacing endocardially. 2) More common in patients with persistent AF. 3) More frequent in the LA than in the RA. 4) Mostly located in regions with normal voltages at baseline. All those findings suggest the importance of the functional substrate mapping in the atrium and could lead to novel therapeutic targets. Abstract Figure. Example of atrial DEEP
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".